Hong Kong Ivory traders encouraging buyers to smuggle ivory: TRAFFIC

first_imgExporting ivory bought in Hong Kong to mainland China would involve crossing an international border, which is illegal and in violation of CITES regulations.But 27 of the 74 traders that TRAFFIC surveyed encouraged buyers to take ivory out of Hong Kong without obtaining CITES permits.While some shopkeepers suggested hiding small ivory trinkets in bags and luggage, others offered more detailed strategies to conceal purchased ivory. Several licensed ivory dealers in Hong Kong are offering strategies for buyers to take ivory out of the city illegally, according to a new report by wildlife trade and monitoring group TRAFFIC.Members of TRAFFIC teams, posing as tourists, surveyed 131 legal ivory dealers in Hong Kong in August and December 2015. Most of these shops — which included antique galleries, gift and souvenir shops, and jewellery and specialty stores — are concentrated in areas that tend to attract tourists and antique buyers.Ivory jewelry. Photo by USFWS Mountain-Prairie, licensed under CC BY 2.0/Flickr.The team found that of the 74 (or 56 percent) licensed shops selling ivory, only 23 shops (or 31 percent) had their licenses displayed during the surveys. This is in violation of Hong Kong regulations, according to which all licensed ivory dealers must display their license in a conspicuous position on their premises.Moreover, when the team asked the shopkeepers if the ivory on display could be taken to mainland China, more than one-third of the traders (27 of the 74 traders) encouraged the buyers to smuggle ivory out of Hong Kong without obtaining the necessary permits. Exporting ivory bought in Hong Kong to mainland China would involve crossing an international border, which is illegal and in violation of CITES regulations. (CITES is short for Convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora, under which, international trade in elephant ivory is banned.)Some shopkeepers told the teams, for example, that small ivory trinkets for personal use could be easily hidden in bags and luggage. Others suggested more detailed strategies to conceal purchased ivory, such as offering to deliver the ivory products to Shenzhen in mainland China for a fee of HKD 10,000 (~$1,285).“Insufficient compliance by the city’s licensed traders highlights major shortcomings with Hong Kong’s current regulation of the local ivory trade,” Wilson Lau, a Programme Officer with TRAFFIC and a co-author of the report, said in a statement. “Clearly, the regulatory framework together with law enforcement efforts are proving insufficient deterrents, judging by how many ivory traders openly violate the rules.”African elephants in Kruger Park, South Africa. Photo by Rhett Butler.Hong Kong is one of the world’s major ivory trade hubs. Following the CITES ban on global ivory trade, Hong Kong prohibited the import and export of ivory, but allowed domestic trade in pre-1990 (or pre-ban) ivory to continue. However, advocacy groups have suggested that many traders use loopholes within Hong Kong’s laws to re-stock their “legal” ivory stockpiles with illegal ivory from recently poached elephants.In March this year, for example, a Hong Court convicted two men for illegally possessing and selling elephant ivory at their licensed outlet. Forensic analysis showed that the ivory in their market had been acquired after 1990. The men, however, received minimal fines of HKD 6,000 ($770) and HKD 8,000 ($1000) respectively, according to TRAFFIC.“Heavier penalties, which would raise the deterrence against would-be offenders and discourage criminal syndicates from using the city as a favoured smuggling channel, is urgently needed,” Cheryl Lo, Senior Wildlife Crime Officer, WWF Hong Kong, said in the statement. “The proposal to increase maximum penalties to 10 years’ imprisonment is significant and reasonable, and should be supported by legislators together with the local ivory trade ban.In December 2016, Hong Kong announced its three-step plan to phase out domestic ivory trade by the end of 2021. This includes banning the possession and sale of all ivory obtained before 1990. However, for the ban to be effective, monitoring and law enforcement activities need to be stepped up, the report says.“Experience teaches us that bans with commensurate investment and dedication to their effective implementation would deliver the best outcome,” said Tom Milliken, TRAFFIC’s Elephant and Rhino Program Leader.Worked ivory on display in Hong Kong. Photo by Warren R.M. Stuart / CC 2.0 Generic License. Animals, Conservation, Elephants, Environment, Environmental Crime, Ivory, Ivory Trade, Mammals, Trade, Wildlife, Wildlife Conservation, Wildlife Trade, Wildlife Trafficking Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsoredcenter_img Article published by Shreya Dasguptalast_img read more